vtsnowedin wrote:It has been in force sense 1979 and without it there would be 250 million more Chinese. So without it China would be in much worse shape then it is today. It is too late for other overcrowded countries to adopt it now. They need a zero child policy for a decade or more. Of course religious and ethnic realities will keep that from happening so war, famine and plagues are in store for the near future.
careinke wrote:With a zero child policy, the population starts declining immediately, or at least within seconds. If I were Dog, I would make women sterile after their first child. Then I would re-evaluate after the population receded to less than a billion.
careinke wrote:With a zero child policy, the population starts declining immediately, or at least within seconds. If I were Dog, I would make women sterile after their first child. Then I would re-evaluate after the population receded to less than a billion.
DesuMaiden wrote:It might sound draconian, but I think it is necessary. You can't keep on increasing population in a country that is already overpopulated. China is already severely overpopulated. You can't double its population again. So it put a halt to population growth in China. I think that's a good thing..
SeaGypsy wrote:DesuMaiden wrote:It might sound draconian, but I think it is necessary. You can't keep on increasing population in a country that is already overpopulated. China is already severely overpopulated. You can't double its population again. So it put a halt to population growth in China. I think that's a good thing..
Actually it didn't halt population growth. Since implementation was never absolute & many rural regions had exemptions, the policy certainly reduced population growth, but had a complete implementation occurred the result would have been reduction of population, negative growth. The reality is that the policy as implemented roughly reduced population growth from close to 2% per annum to about half of 1%, so roughly by 2/3rds. The policy has now broadly been loosened further as the economic growth has overtaken population growth to an extent threatening labour supply in the long term. Millions of SE Asians are now migrating to China for work, with wages tiny by western standards but roughly double those in average ASEAN countries.
SilentRunning wrote:I think China's 1 child policy should be continued, and expanded to the entire planet.
dashster wrote:I would like to see a calculation of how many children each couple did have on average. As someone said, it looks to have been above 1.
It is a shame that the world's most populated country is the only one that has taken steps to curb population growth. The United States - the third most populated country - still sees population growth as part of the solution, a way to make things better. Although it might not be correct to say that everyone thinks it makes the country better. A lot of people will say something that suggests that they think that because there was immigration, and that since people and their descendants have benefited from it, it must always continue.
Alfred Tennyson wrote:We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Return to Open Topic Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests