In Mr. Pearce’s view, the villain is not overpopulation but, rather, overconsumption. “We can survive massive demographic change,” he said in 2011. But he is less sanguine about the overuse of available resources ...
“Rising consumption today far outstrips the rising head count as a threat to the planet,”
Pops wrote:In Mr. Pearce’s view, the villain is not overpopulation but, rather, overconsumption. “We can survive massive demographic change,” he said in 2011. But he is less sanguine about the overuse of available resources ...
“Rising consumption today far outstrips the rising head count as a threat to the planet,”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markadomanis/2015/05/30/ukraines-economy-is-a-disaster-its-demography-is-even-worse/... But regardless of one’s opinion, the current demographic trends mean that Ukraine is going to be much less populous in the future than was expected even a year or two ago. As noted, the 250,000 loss recorded from 2014-2015 was almost entirely the result of natural trends, of deaths exceeding births. An accurate reckoning of all of the people displaced by the war would likely result in a much larger figure, perhaps upwards of one million. Right at this very moment permanent damage is being done to Ukraine’s future output.
So what does this mean? Well I would suggest that it means that Ukraine’s future financing needs are going to be much larger than anticipated. The Ukrainian economy will have many fewer productive workers in future years, and this decline is only going to accelerate. The country’s demographics were already rather bleak, but they are lapsing back into the catastrophic.
ROCKMAN wrote:Yellow - So the solution is to castrate all male immigrants? Hmm...might slow the flow up a bit. LOL
HARM wrote:@Pops, overconsumption is an important part of the equation, sure, but it pales in comparison to the 800-lb gorilla in our midst: overpopulation.
HARM wrote:And for the record Ehrlich was not "wrong", just way too early on his estimates. Things get very interesting once we pass 10 billion people on a planet with enough renewable resources for maybe 1-2 billion living at marginally Western standards.
Pops wrote:I'm not saying we're in tall clover, just that the situation has changed since Ehrlich when we were adding a billion every 7 years. Repeatedly arguing he was right, that we're all gonna die, but it is going to be THIS Tuesday, not the next Tuesday predicted every week for the last 50 years is not gonna convince anyone.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests