Cid_Yama wrote:And it begins again.
We didn't re-start the cold war again, Putin did.
I'm all for the 99% by the way but that also includes 99% in the Baltics and Swedes that don't want Russian submarines in their harbors and don't ever want foreign tanks rolling across the border uninvited.
The American tanks were invited.
This is just a "is what it is" situation. US military is going to position wherever there is a problem, if there were not a problem, the miltiary would not be there. The objective truth is that nobody was planning or wanting a cold war with Russia.
I've said this a long time ago, in the Ukraine threads, that if Putin keeps making noise in east europe then the US ship of state turns slowly but yes it will eventually turn to go face that. This is just how it is. We didn't start this. We are only responding to it.
Cid, you and me agree on domestic things but I'm more of a FDR democrat.
My only issue about more US military in Europe is just that we have to pay for all this and it's actually not fair. Europe needs to pay more, really Europe should get it together and have its own European Army, really there should not be heavy US arms in east Europe. EU, as a whole, is wealthier than we are. But they give their people free education and all kinds of bennies and barely spend on any military at all, while we over here have to go without so we can fund this military to defend everyone -- that situation really cannot continue forever, it's not fair.
But I'm not against it, on principle, making people in the Baltics, and in Sweden, or Poland, feel more secure. They are our allies.
I think what you do Cid is just always think this is all the USA, you do not recognize there really are real people in Sweden, in Finland, in the Baltics, in East Europe, that are concerned.
P.S. this really is not a big deal or unreasonable. We drew down after the cold war, Putin started it up again, so okay we are putting some more forces into europe again. It's purely defensive, and reactionary to what Russia does. If Putin hadn't done all these things the past couple years, then these extra American forces would not be there, simple as that. Because otherwise we actually have cut the defense budget (sequester) and the Pentagon would prefer areas in the world that it could draw down from. Russia became a NEW problem, on the oven burners, it had been filed away to an old problem and we adjusted to that being done with but here it is again.
I'm not really sure what you would want, Cid. Can you spell it out. Should we not have allies like Japan and South Korea and Australia. Should we dismantle nato. Should we pull back from everywhere, be isolationist and let the allies step up for themselves and make new arrangements amongst themselves, without us? (I'd almost agree with that, I can understand that view)
Do you think war is less likely, just because America pulls back? France and the UK have nukes, too. If European NATO had to go to war with Russia on its own, they'd be very weak without us. Russia could win that kind of war, sans United States. So how would that be safer. Then a France or UK may have to use their nukes, because otherwise they do not have enough conventional military to repel an invasion.
I'm just not sure what your position is, Cid, that's all. Is it totally isolationist.
When would you use the military, under what circumstances? Is it all our fault and we're the bad guy, if europeans ask us to place more forces there?