Pops wrote:mousepad wrote: including the fact that no others are available anymore.
You want so much to get a rise out of me to feed your obviously wilted little ego, that you make my point blindly never realising.
Why not stop the petty insults?
Let's start again with your lame comment.
Pops wrote:trump got elected bashing them but wouldn't get the sheets changed and greens mowed without them.
You appear to suggest that if you hire immigrants you are not allowed to be anti-immigrant. Those 2 things are not mutually exclusive. In many cases you don't have a choice anymore in hiring. Besides, hiring based on skin color is illegal.
Only big companies and state institutions apparently can get away with racist hiring practices, they call it affirmative actions.
I'm anti-immigrant. Yet when my high tech business posts a new engineering job, out of 10 resumes received, 4 are chinese, 3 are indian, 2 are mid-east, 1 is european. Besides being illegal, I can't afford to be selective based on race and only take europeans. I have to hire the best of the best. Yet, that doesn't mean I also have to be pro-immigrant.
Pops wrote:That you are butt-hurt about it "for various reasons" is on you.
Of course it's on me. That doesn't make it less valid.
Just the same way as you apparently find joy in white girls being raped (sick in my opinion), I have other reasons and other joys. I have the same rights to be heard with my concerns, reasons, fears and emotions as you do.