jedrider wrote: The current SC is a religious spearhead into a multicultural secular nation.
Not really. As Careinke noted above, religious people have freedom of speech just like non religious people do.
Personally, this is one SCOTUS ruling I support.
IMHO We should all be cheering when the SCOTUS supports individual rights over the state.
jedrider wrote: The court's liberal justices said the decision weakens separation of church and state.
The constitution doesn't call for a "separation of church and state.
What the Constitution says is that the state cannot establish a state religion. The liberals have got this all backward----the FIRST AMENDMENT to the constitution isn't about limiting individual rights----its about restricting the power of the STATE. Its just silly to claim that a football coach praying after a game establishes a state religion, or that a soccer player thanking god when he scores a goal establishes a state religion.
People praying in public after sporting events.....even praying on TV DURING sporting events...... does not establish a state religion and is therefore protected by the constitutionjedrider wrote:Taking a prayer in public as a controlling figure, basically forcing EVERYONE to part take of this Christian ritual
What nonsense. Are you incapable of walking away or turning your head or closing your eyelids? No one is forcing you to watch anything. Try to be a little bit tolerant of other people instead of being so biased and prejudiced against people who have different beliefs then you do.
jedrider wrote: if a Muslim tried praying to Alah like that, he would never get employment again.
Please don't start posting crazy anti-Muslim nonsense. There are millions of Muslims in this country who pray several times a day and are gainfully employed as well. Its bad enough you post anti-Catholic conspiracy theories....there is no need for you to start in on the Muslims too.
Cheers!