evilgenius wrote:I wonder what Trump will do? He's not famous for being careful with his rhetoric
evilgenius wrote:The Iranians have already jumped in to say they had nothing to do with it, but they would if it were them behind it, I suppose.
Cog wrote:Well the US Navy can put every Iranian naval asset on the bottom of the Persian Gulf, so I'd say that would be something.
It said the USS Bainbridge observed Iranian naval boats operating in the area in the hours after the explosions, and later removing the unexploded mine from the side of the Kokuka Courageous.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-48627014Yutaka Katada, the president of Japanese company Kokuka Sangyo which owns the vessel, said it was hit twice before the crew abandoned ship.
After the US military alleged that Iranian limpet mines were responsible, Mr Katada on Monday said sailors saw "flying objects" before the attack, according to the Associated Press - apparently contradicting the US narrative.
He had also earlier spoken of being hit by a "shell", rather than a mine.
"We have had an initial report that our ship... was hit by a shell. After that, our crew saw that other ships came
Yoshua wrote:The U.S started the war against Iran a year ago when Trump imposed sanctions on Iran.
Yoshua wrote:..... it doesn't matter if Iran was behind the attacks...the U.S has declared that it was Iran...and that is all that matters.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests