jedrider wrote:"Of course there are many Democrats that believe that a federal law can be passed that would make Roe v. Wade the law of the land no matter what the Supreme Court decides. For example, just check out what Bernie Sanders said after he heard about this draft decision…"
Oh, I guess that's how our Constitution works, that Congress passes laws. Yes, it would be tidier if the Supreme Court would just give women the rights that they believe they should have, rather than denying them.
The "fetus" has rights? That didn't come from any constitution, though and, probably, not even the Bible, nor most religious texts.
EnergyUnlimited wrote:jedrider wrote:"Of course there are many Democrats that believe that a federal law can be passed that would make Roe v. Wade the law of the land no matter what the Supreme Court decides. For example, just check out what Bernie Sanders said after he heard about this draft decision…"
Oh, I guess that's how our Constitution works, that Congress passes laws. Yes, it would be tidier if the Supreme Court would just give women the rights that they believe they should have, rather than denying them.
The "fetus" has rights? That didn't come from any constitution, though and, probably, not even the Bible, nor most religious texts.
These are even better news.
Upon next win of republicans abortion can be banned nationwide on a federal level and doctors performing it prosecuted for murder.
Religious people were too stupid to assess "fetus rights" correctly (albeit some good efforts have been made).
Fortunately biology came to a rescue and now we know that it is impossible to draw a line between fetus and a human and separate them by some arbitrary definition.
If you don't want children - keep your legs closed.
Doly wrote:If you don't want children - keep your legs closed.
Nice to know that there are apparently many men that have chosen to give up on sex with women. They won't be missed. If you only want one sausage, you don't need the whole pig.
EnergyUnlimited wrote:Long overdue motion to uproot and eradicate fallacy of "women rights" is finally coming to America.
Better late than never
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/what ... en-before/
If you don't want children - keep your legs closed.
JuanP wrote:EnergyUnlimited wrote:Long overdue motion to uproot and eradicate fallacy of "women rights" is finally coming to America.
Better late than never
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/what ... en-before/
If you don't want children - keep your legs closed.
Or you could get sterilized, like I did in my youth, and fuck as much as you want all your life without any procreation worries or concerns. It's not like we are living in the Middle Ages! I have never in my whole life engaged in sexual intercourse with the goal of producing biological offspring.
EnergyUnlimited wrote:JuanP wrote:EnergyUnlimited wrote:Long overdue motion to uproot and eradicate fallacy of "women rights" is finally coming to America.
Better late than never
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/what ... en-before/
If you don't want children - keep your legs closed.
Or you could get sterilized, like I did in my youth, and fuck as much as you want all your life without any procreation worries or concerns. It's not like we are living in the Middle Ages! I have never in my whole life engaged in sexual intercourse with the goal of producing biological offspring.
This may not protect your wallet though.
If married and subsequently divorced you may still end up paying alimony to a parasite.
And a longer term relation may be constructed as a marriage and legally considered as such.
JuanP wrote:True, but that is what prenuptial agreements are for. Almost every member of my extended family had their loved ones sign one before getting married; it's SOP for my family. The funny thing is none of them ever got divorced.
Exes would be generously provided for, of course, if it came to that.
I renounced my inherited interests in my family's multinational business conglomerate before I met my wife, so she had no need to sign a prenup. I still have a trust fund I can't get rid of, but I don't use the money for me. I'd let her take what little I have with pleasure, anyway.
If you need a good woman - get one from a store.
It will come with warranty and a large selection of software, custom features and spare parts.
Doly wrote:If you need a good woman - get one from a store.
It will come with warranty and a large selection of software, custom features and spare parts.
Sorry, sex dolls aren't going to be a manufacturing priority in an energy scarce world. You'll just have to go gay or do without.
EnergyUnlimited wrote:Doly wrote:If you need a good woman - get one from a store.
It will come with warranty and a large selection of software, custom features and spare parts.
Sorry, sex dolls aren't going to be a manufacturing priority in an energy scarce world. You'll just have to go gay or do without.
Why not? - being infertile they will immensely contribute to resource preservation and population reduction.
Run on electricity rather than on scarce food...
They may even be SUBSIDIZED.
Return to North America Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests