Doly wrote:Unfortunate that Bentley chose to pitch in recently with Laherrere and Hall doing the run of the mill Happy McPeakster routine here recently in Environmental Sustainability or some such "gee can I please not be reviewed by experts in the field" pub.
You are being near impossible to parse again, Adam.
Apologies. And I finally got a response to stick on that excellent reference you provided.
Doly wrote:Because I'm kind of persistent, I figured that Environmental Sustainability is a peer-reviewed scientific journal (definitely the opposite of "gee can I please not be reviewed by experts") and that you are referring to this paper:
https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/p ... 0727185300
Environmental Sustainability isn't the place you find resource economists, petroleum engineer or petroleum geologists, mathematical geology specialists or top notch geologists in general. Nothing wrong with a powder puff review team, when you certainly don't want someone to knows something on the topic to get a look at it.
Doly wrote:
Thanks for the clouded reference, but is it too much to ask that you give up on your "peak oil isn't happening" badass attitude? Since you obviously don't believe in it?
Peak oil HAS happened. Again. In 2018. Peak oil is a given, I've said it before, following Hubert's math and logic as he described it in his 1956 seminal work. That doesn't appear to be good enough for some folks, but it is true. The correct answer to all of this was just to solve the problem of course. Can someone who builds peak oil models be considered a non-peak oiler?